Key messages
Equipment in the healthcare and social assistance industry is used for a range of purposes, including to manage WHS risks.
For example, hoists can reduce the risks associated with people handling and face masks can reduce the risk of infectious diseases. However, equipment can also introduce risks that need to be managed in the workplace. Thinking about what equipment to use, and ensuring it is well-maintained, and reduces the risk of injuries or illnesses.
Jump to:
How you should identify and assess hazards and risks How you should control risks Case study: Mobile workstations
How you should identify and assess hazards and risks
Consult with workers and others to identify and assess hazards and risks
How you should control risks
Consult with workers and others to design controls
Eliminate the risks of equipment hazards as much as you reasonably can, including through good work design.
If risks cannot be eliminated, use the hierarchy of controls. The following are example controls for managing the risks of equipment:
- Substitute the hazard with a safer alternative (e.g. replace castors or improve handles on trollies to make them easier to push or use)
- Isolate the hazard from any person exposed to it (e.g. install screens to minimise radiation from equipment such as X-Ray and MRI machines).
- Engineering controls (e.g. equipment guarding)
- Administrative controls (e.g. implement a tag-out system to ensure the equipment is isolated from its power source and not operated while maintenance or cleaning work is being done, train workers to operate equipment safely).
- Provide PPE (e.g. lead-lined aprons for workers using X-Ray machines, protective eyewear).
Use a combination of control measures to effectively eliminate or minimise risks.
Maintain and review controls to ensure they are being used and are effective, especially after any changes to the task or workplace.

Case study – Mobile workstations
Nurses in a busy regional hospital have been using mobile workstations with laptops to take clinical notes and manage patient information. Since the workstations were rolled out, there has been an increased incidence among nurses of wrist injuries, which the hospital suspects may be due to the ergonomic set-up of the workstations. On reviewing the manufacturer’s instructions for both the laptop and the mobile workstation, the hospital discovers they have been set up incorrectly and are not being used as intended.
The hospital consults with nurses who share that the mobile workstations have increased both physical and psychosocial risks, as nurses also have less time away from patients and feel they are expected to be ‘always on the go’. The hospital redesigns work processes, rotating nurses through shared, static workstations away from patients for administrative work. The workstations are ergonomically designed and reduce the incidence of wrist injuries.



