Key messages
Workers in the healthcare and social assistance industry often work with people who are injured, unwell, experiencing mental illness or dementia, or experiencing other difficulties, such as the death of a loved one.
When people experience these things, they sometimes may behave aggressively. In some cases, this behaviour can be prevented from escalating through reducing stress and frustration in the workplace. In other cases, the person’s clinical condition may be contributing to this behaviour. This can become a hazard for workers and creates work health and safety (WHS) risks.
Workers in the healthcare and social assistance industry sometimes have to work with people who are behaving aggressively or displaying behaviours of concern. However, workers should never be harmed because of this.
As part of your primary duty to ensure the health and safety of workers at the workplace, you must do everything you reasonably can to protect workers from being harmed by violence, aggression and harassment at work. It may not always be possible for you to eliminate the risk of aggressive behaviour to workers. However, you must minimise the risk of people being injured by this as much as you can.
Jump to:
How you should identify and assess hazards and risks How you should control risks Case study: Gender-related violence in a hospital ward
How you should identify and assess hazards and risks
Consult with workers and others to identify and assess hazards and risks
How you should control risks
Consult with workers and others to design controls
Eliminate the risks of violence, aggression and harassment, including sexual harassment, as much as you reasonably can, including through good work design. Use the hierarchy of controls, particularly when seeking to reduce the risk of assaults.
Maintain and review controls to ensure they are being used and are effective, especially after any changes to the task or workplace.

Case study – Gender-related violence in a hospital ward
A 45-year-old male patient has just been admitted to a general ward with suspected early-onset dementia, as there were not enough spaces in the dementia ward to accommodate him. Throughout the day shift, nurses complain that he has been making frequent unwelcome comments, including sexual innuendo. The head nurse speaks to him about this behaviour, but the comments continue and escalate.
At the end of the day shift, this information is noted in the handover notes, but the shift handover is disrupted by a life-threatening emergency elsewhere on the ward, and ultimately not adequately discussed. A male nurse originally moved to the ward is diverted elsewhere due to competing patient needs.
At 3:00 am the next morning, a younger female nurse is asked to do rounds alone and the man assaults her.
The hospital investigates the incident and identifies multiple failures, including a lack of adequate staffing and worker training, a lack of consideration of the risk of escalation and violence, a failure to consider the gender mix of staff where there was an identified risk of sexual harassment, poor systems for information sharing and handover, and a lack of security systems and distress alarms for nurses. The hospital puts in place a range of changes to address these issues, which reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring in the future.