Model WHS Laws

We created the model WHS laws in 2011.

See all

WHS laws in your jurisdiction

Contact your regulator

Data and Research

We collect, analyse and publish data and information on work health and safety and workers' compensation.

See our data

See our latest
Key work health and safety statistics

explore our data

Resources and Publications

We publish a wide range of resources covering many work health and safety topics.

See all

Read our Codes of Practice

read the codes

Key messages 

Workers in the healthcare and social assistance industry often work with people who are injured, unwell, experiencing mental illness or dementia, or experiencing other difficulties, such as the death of a loved one. 

When people experience these things, they sometimes may behave aggressively. In some cases, this behaviour can be prevented from escalating through reducing stress and frustration in the workplace. In other cases, the person’s clinical condition may be contributing to this behaviour. This can become a hazard for workers and creates work health and safety (WHS) risks. 

Workers in the healthcare and social assistance industry sometimes have to work with people who are behaving aggressively or displaying behaviours of concern. However, workers should never be harmed because of this. 

As part of your primary duty to ensure the health and safety of workers at the workplace, you must do everything you reasonably can to protect workers from being harmed by violence, aggression and harassment at work. It may not always be possible for you to eliminate the risk of aggressive behaviour to workers. However, you must minimise the risk of people being injured by this as much as you can.  


Jump to:

How you should identify and assess hazards and risks How you should control risks Case study: Gender-related violence in a hospital ward

Work-related violence, aggression and harassment are psychosocial hazards and fall into the group broadly termed ‘harmful behaviours’. They create risks of both physical and psychological harm to workers. 

Note: Violence and aggression may happen between workers or come from other people at the workplace such as patients, clients, family members or the public.

Violence, aggression and harassment occurring between workers is covered in the section on psychosocial hazards.   

This section is focused on work-related violence, aggression and harassment (including sexual harassment) from other people in the workplace, such as patients, consumers, clients, residents, family members or the public.

Healthcare and social assistance workers are particularly vulnerable to harmful behaviours due to high pressure, complex work environments and frequent interactions with people. When compared to other industries, the healthcare and social assistance workforce also has a higher proportion of female workers and workers from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. This may increase the risk of some kinds of harmful behaviours, such as gender-based sexual harassment or racism. For more information, see the Code of Practice: Sexual and gender-based harassment.

Subtle forms of violence, such as tensions between people, incivility, and rudeness, often lead to more extreme harmful behaviours when the causes of stress are not controlled. These subtle forms of violence can still be harmful, especially when they occur regularly or over a long time. The diagram below shows how behaviour can worsen over time if hazards are not controlled.

Figure 6: How harmful behaviours can worsen if not addressed early

Diagram of how negative behaviour, can worsen to verbal aggression and then physical aggression if not addressed early.

You are responsible for protecting workers and others in the workplace from work-related violence, aggression and harassment (including sexual and gender-based harassment). You must eliminate risks if you reasonably can.

If that is not possible, you must minimise risks as much as you reasonably can. 

For example, some consumers with psychiatric conditions may behave violently towards workers but still require medical treatment. In this situation, it may not be possible for an employer to eliminate the risk of violence to their workers. 

However, employers must still minimise risks as much as they can (e.g. through effective medical management, placement in a specialised ward, having enough workers with the right mix of skills, having workers trained in de-escalation, having ‘code black’ arrangements, and, where required, the use of restrictive practices such as seclusion if risk cannot be effectively managed in another way).  

The first step you must take is to do a risk assessment to work out what kind of risks their workers could be exposed to. The risk assessment should consider things like:

  • if the work requires workers to deal directly with people
  • how likely the violent behaviour is (e.g. do people being treated have medical conditions that may increase the chance of violence? Does the person have a previous history of violence? Could they be affected by drugs or alcohol?)
  • the type of facilities available at a workplace (e.g. is there a safe place for workers to go if someone is behaving violently? Is there a lot of light and noise which may agitate people with certain conditions?)

These factors will help you understand the risk to workers. They must then use controls to prevent risks wherever they can.

To control the risks from harmful behaviours, you need to look at the underlying causes of the behaviour as well as addressing the behaviour itself. For example, harmful behaviours can be an inappropriate response to high levels of stress. While the behaviour itself should be addressed, if the cause of the stress is also not addressed, the risk will not be controlled. 

For example, harmful behaviours from family members might result from:

  • stress caused by long wait times without access to resources or information (e.g. updates on wait times and patient progress, lack of resources or amenities while waiting), or
  • anger due to a perceived lack of fairness or concern and distress from thinking that their family member is not receiving the care they need.

Harmful behaviours may result from stress caused by: 

  • changes in work systems (e.g. sudden or unexplained shifts in daily routine, different personnel due to funding changes, work scheduling and staffing)
  • anger due to a perception they are not being listened to or understood, or their needs not being addressed
  • frustration (e.g. due to inattention or lack of active support, living arrangements or conflict with other residents)
  • ability, or lack of ability, to make their own choices or have control
  • withdrawal from medication, alcohol or other drugs, and
  • use of restrictive practices as a last resort to prevent harm to a client or patient.

While you might not always be able to eliminate the sources of stress, there are a range of things you can do to minimise them, and therefore reduce the potential for violence, harassment, and aggression. Awareness of the sources will also help you to recognise early signs of an escalating situation and safely intervene. 

In some cases, behaviour that is harmful to workers may not result from intentional aggression. Even when the harmful behaviour is not intentional, the WHS risks from the behaviour must still be managed by employers and contractors.

Work related violence is common to human services and care occupations in the healthcare and social assistance industry but has different causes and expressions in different types of workplaces. WHS controls should be sensitive to this (e.g. behaviours related to an intellectual disability are different to those related to dementia).

In some cases, it may be appropriate to remove the person displaying harmful behaviours, so they no longer pose a risk to workers. For example, a visitor who behaves aggressively may be: 

  • given a warning about the need to treat staff with respect
  • issued with a barring notice limiting the times they can attend the facility (e.g. to times where there are additional workers or managers available, or when a particular worker is not on shift), or
  • banned from the facility altogether.

How you should identify and assess hazards and risks


Consult with workers and others to identify and assess hazards and risks

  • Walk through and inspect the workplace (including for low visibility in service areas, entries and exits for workers after hours, long patient queues and wait times).
  • Identify situations and areas of the workplace where patients, residents and others may experience heightened negative emotions such as stress, distress, frustration, communication difficulties, anger, a sense of unfairness or have unreasonable expectations of the services that can or should be provided.
  • Observe interaction between workers and others in the workplace (e.g. rudeness and incivility, poor relationships, racism, or workers avoiding being around certain people).
  • Conduct confidential worker surveys about incidents or behaviours that have caused discomfort and situations that had the potential to become more violent.
  • Identify factors external to the workplace which may lead to violence or aggressive behaviour (e.g. patients affected by drugs or alcohol).
  • Talk to patients or clients about their support needs, including any unmet needs.
  • Consider the mix of patients or clients and what ‘triggers’ they may have.
  • Consider varying communication abilities (e.g. clients with an intellectual disability).
  • Consider the different impacts on workers depending on their role (e.g. are workers in a role that is more likely to expose them to aggressive people?)
  • Consider the types of services offered at the facility and the different types and levels of risk involved (e.g. emergency departments, mental health, drug and alcohol, brain injury, aged care, neurology, midwifery and early childhood are often higher risk environments for aggression).

  • providing care or services to people who are distressed, confused, afraid, ill, impacted by mental health, an intellectual disability or dementia, or affected by drugs and alcohol
  • handling valuable or restricted items (e.g. cash or medicines)
  • working offsite or alone (e.g. a patient's home, without supervision)
  • working in unpredictable environments (e.g. where family members may pose a risk to workers’ safety)
  • inappropriate placement (e.g. younger clients placed in residential aged care)
  • service and care methods, policies or communication that causes or escalates frustration (e.g. low staffing levels, unclear policies, insecure employment, high staff turnover, setting unachievable expectations of the services an organisation or workers can provide, not sharing information about patient progress)
  • poor quality behavioural support plans
  • untrained staff being directed to perform complex care work
  • low worker diversity and a workplace culture that accepts or tolerates gendered violence.

  • acceptance of inappropriate behaviour (e.g. racially or sexually crude conversations, innuendo or offensive jokes are part of work culture or not challenged when they occur)
  • power imbalances along gendered lines (e.g. workplaces where one gender holds most of the management and decision-making positions)
  • treatment of workers as disposable or replaceable, or promotion of the idea that care and support work is unskilled work that “anyone can do”
  • working in isolation in restrictive spaces with limited supervision or access to support (e.g. vehicles such as ambulances, remote locations, wards late at night, patient’s homes)
  • poor understanding among workplace leaders of the nature, causes and impacts of sexual harassment. While anyone can experience harassment, there are certain groups who are more likely to experience it. Some workers may be at greater risk because of their age, gender, sexuality, migration status, disability and literacy skills.

  

How you should control risks


Consult with workers and others to design controls

Eliminate the risks of violence, aggression and harassment, including sexual harassment, as much as you reasonably can, including through good work design. Use the hierarchy of controls, particularly when seeking to reduce the risk of assaults.

Prevent harmful behaviours and escalation

  • Arrange rooms to minimise agitation. For example, avoid cluttered rooms and allow enough space to move and use equipment.
  • Promote comfort including by reducing noise and other stimuli, controlling temperature, allowing access to food, drink, entertainment and other items that may reduce stress or boredom (e.g. provide mobile phone charging points and other distractions).
  • Provide security cameras to monitor risks and deter harmful behaviours.
  • Roster on additional workers and have supervisors perform more regular check-ins to monitor potential causes of escalation.
  • Ensure workplace design and lighting provides good visibility, including in car parks.

Reduce harm

  • Separate workers from the public with fixed or removable barriers (e.g. high counters, furniture, screens on counters or screens between a driver and passenger).
  • Provide two exits in all interview and treatment rooms.
  • Provide both fixed and portable duress alarms.
  • Arrange the workplace (e.g. furniture and partitions, observation mirrors) to ensure good visibility of areas accessible to patients/families where appropriate. Improve natural surveillance and avoid restrictive movement.
  • Ensure there are no areas where workers could become trapped, such as rooms with keyed locks.
  • Provide secure areas where workers can retreat.
  • If patients need to be restrained, provide access to quiet, private and secure areas to minimise distress to others.
  • Home visits should not be undertaken by workers without police or security when there is a high risk of violence.

  • Secure any objects that could be thrown or used to injure someone.
  • Use face shields where spitting or intentionally coughing is a risk. However, consider how this may impact communication and potentially increase frustration.
  • Ensure communication systems (e.g. phones, intercoms, panic buttons and duress alarms) are provided, maintained and tested.
    • Ensure community workers have access to duress alarms. These should work in all locations and be able to be responded to quickly.
  • Provide suitable personal protective equipment (e.g. stab-proof vests and protective clothing for security guards).
  • Ensure vehicles are fit-for-purpose (e.g. have central locking devices, GPS tracking devices to allow drivers in distress to be located, lighting to allow the driver to monitor passenger behaviour, are well maintained so they do not break down at unsafe locations or times).

Prevent harmful behaviours

  • Communicate regularly and transparently to reduce distress. For example, provide family and friends with information about patient progress and location.
  • Provide enough workers to both care for and support clients and patients, and to keep workers safe. Staff should not work alone where there is a risk of violence.
    • In some workplaces and only where appropriate, this may include security guards or staff trained in restraint, mediation or de-escalation techniques.
  • Consider the gender mix of workers (e.g. roster male workers to provide care where there is a known risk of harassment towards female workers).
  • Identify rostering practices that minimise escalation and ensure continuity of supports for the patient or client.
  • Alternate tasks in the workplace where possible (particularly tasks requiring high levels of interaction) and ensure workers have regular breaks if aggression or incivility is likely.
  • Use barring notices that limit or prevent access to the facility for visitors who display aggressive behaviour.

Prevent escalation and reduce harm

  • Ensure there are enough workers to identify escalating behaviour early to give the best chance of de-escalation.
  • Establish a system for screening patients, clients and visitors for risk of violence, and ensure the right worker cares or supports them. (e.g. where possible, triage and prioritise care for patients with acute mental health conditions or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, ensure staff rostered for patients or clients have sufficient training).
  • Match staffing levels and supervision to patient or client needs.
  • Provide ‘buddy’ shifts for workers delivering supports to complex clients for the first time.
  • Establish risk management and behavioural plans that can be clearly understood by any worker using them and ensure workers have access to them, especially for in-home care and higher risk patients. Plans should consider:
    • Who should be providing care? (e.g. gender, skill mix, violence prevention training)
    • How many staff are required to provide care safely? (e.g. pairs for personal care, 3 to shower an elderly person who is resisting)
    • Is a 1 to 1 ‘patient special’ required? Should this be a clinical or a security special?
    • Where will the patient be located?
    • Access to duress devices and response times.
    • Has the area been cleared of anything that can be used as an improvised weapon?
    • Medical management (e.g. PRN medications charted)
    • Escalation pathway where controls are ineffective, and
    • The risk of violence from family members.
  • Use behavioural contracts that set expectations about behaviours that will not be tolerated and consequences (e.g. stop treatment, stop providing support or care in-home, treatment or support only provided in a particular facility).
  • Establish procedures for working in isolation and uncontrolled environments (e.g. risk assessments to determine the safety of a patient’s home at the beginning of each visit).
  • Establish systems for immediate medical attention where needed, reporting, debriefing and support after an incident, and consideration of paid leave for impacted staff).
  • Report criminal behaviour to police.

  • Establish pre-shift team briefings to share information on potential risks.
  • Provide training for staff in:
    • identifying early warning signs of violent behaviours from patients and visitors
    • de-escalation techniques
    • personal safety (e.g. understanding the physical environment, breakaway techniques, using evasive measures)
    • specific care and support needs (e.g. dementia, mental health conditions, other medical and health-related supports as required)
  • Establish a dedicated, trained, regularly drilled, multi-disciplinary team to respond to high  risk situations (e.g. code black team).
  • Provide additional supervision and support for new, young and inexperienced workers.
  • Encourage workers to keep records and screenshots if harmful behaviour occurs online or through phone communication and report the behaviour to their supervisor.

Maintain and review controls to ensure they are being used and are effective, especially after any changes to the task or workplace.

 

Case study – Gender-related violence in a hospital ward   

A 45-year-old male patient has just been admitted to a general ward with suspected early-onset dementia, as there were not enough spaces in the dementia ward to accommodate him. Throughout the day shift, nurses complain that he has been making frequent unwelcome comments, including sexual innuendo. The head nurse speaks to him about this behaviour, but the comments continue and escalate.

At the end of the day shift, this information is noted in the handover notes, but the shift handover is disrupted by a life-threatening emergency elsewhere on the ward, and ultimately not adequately discussed. A male nurse originally moved to the ward is diverted elsewhere due to competing patient needs.

At 3:00 am the next morning, a younger female nurse is asked to do rounds alone and the man assaults her.

The hospital investigates the incident and identifies multiple failures, including a lack of adequate staffing and worker training, a lack of consideration of the risk of escalation and violence, a failure to consider the gender mix of staff where there was an identified risk of sexual harassment, poor systems for information sharing and handover, and a lack of security systems and distress alarms for nurses. The hospital puts in place a range of changes to address these issues, which reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring in the future.